Re: GNU Common Lisp (gcl) - need a new security context?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 16:54 -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> Dropping gcl is a bad idea. gcl generates much better code in many
> cases;
> dropping makes Fedora bad for running Common Lisp (CL) applications.
> There are a lot of CL programs, and CL is still important; "Practical
> Common Lisp"
> was published 2005 and was a really popular book.
I am not unwilling to continue with GCL. However I would need some help
from people knowing about these issues (on several architectures) and
how to fix them.
BTW, SELinux is only one issue. GCL doesn't compile even with SELinux
disabled (randomized addresses etc...)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux