Tom Lane wrote:
"Michel Salim" <michel.sylvan@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
I was just over at gnu.org to download the anniversary video recorded
by Stephen Fry, and while I was there decided to take a look at what
systems they recommend as being free.
I've got all the respect in the world for the work that RMS has done
over the years ... but:
gnu.org does not acknowledge any license but the GPL as being "truly
free", and they'll never acknowledge any system that is not 100.00%
GPL code as being "truly free". Draw your own conclusions about how
that stance connects to reality.
It is your claim that is disconnected to reality.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses
http://lwn.net/2001/0301/a/rms-ov-license.php3
There are many valid criticisms against FSF but this often repeated one
has never been among them.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
