On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Yaakov Nemoy wrote: > On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>>> "M" == Mark <markg85@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > M> And all of that for just something you only see once.. Would be > > M> best if smolt-firstboot just didn't have any dependency's or only > > M> deps that are required by other must install (like python) apps as > > M> well > > > > Well, it has to do things like talk over the web, so it's going to > > need some RPC libraries of some type. I think it is, however, obvious > > that the current dependency chain is excessive. > > > > Checking the specfile, I see the python-turboflot dependency came in > > with a change which was not changelogged (and did not include a > > release bump), so there's no information about why that dep was > > added. The next package change was a license tag change, which > > included a release bump and a build. It is possible that something > > snuck out which was not intentended. I'm sure more will be known > > tomorrow when those involved are back from the weekend. > > > > Turboflot should only be necessary for the webapp server end. It is > not necessary for the client or firstboot. > This is now fixed. I would like to ask, yet again, why something like this was brought up on the list? Someone could have contacted us directly or even filed a bug. Please think before posting to this list, its too chatty as it is and is _NOT_ the correct place to go looking for actions to be taken on specific packages and bugs that aren't philosophical in nature. -Mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
