Re: Proposal: Split Fedora into sub-distributions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 07:09:50AM -0400, Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote:
> Maybe it's just me, but I think it's time Fedora stops trying to become  
> another Debian, and starts catering to the groups that comprise it.

I just want to knock this silly idea on the head.  In my opinion there
should be no limits on how many packages get included in Fedora
Everything[i], except two: (1) It should be Free software that
complies with the guidelines and (2) Someone should be willing to put
in the time to maintain it.

Whenever there's a package which is missing, some user will say 'Oh
but it's in Debian' (along with all that other stuff) so I might as
well use Debian.  Unfortunately the mix of packages is different for
each user, so you have to have them all.

Rich.

[i] Packages which make it onto a CD/DVD/spin/mirrors is quite a
different matter of course.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux