On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:05 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 20:22 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > > === Signing and Pushing New Keys === > > * Long discussion on how to handle the package key migration for users. > > FESCo ended up approving Warren's proposal, which can be found here: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/2008-August/001622.html > > * NOTE: Once this is implemented we can start issuing updates again, > > which I think is what most people are interested in hearing about. > > Might have been nice for someone to ping me if you guys were talking > about PackageKit. I guess? At this point it's all a solved problem - the key import mechanism in *current* PK is fine. It's just the version from original F9 that was problematic. > > > <wwoods> f13: yeah, it's weaksauce, but you remember the failure > > > condition for PK was *SO BAD* that we added last-minute horrible > > > hacks to anaconda over jeremy's (valid) objections > > I guess by hacks you meant that I wanted anaconda to auto-import the > fedora signing key at install time. That's what I was referring to, yes. I agree with the principle of importing the signing keys at install-time. I just wish we could have had time to discuss it and choose a solution (and implementation) agreeable to all. So: I used the phrase "horrible hacks" because we had scant *hours* to find and implement the simplest possible workaround, rather than actually discussing the problem and fixing as we normally do. -w
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
