On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 09:39 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > David A. Wheeler wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 20:04 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> The story begins here: > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446860 > > ... > >>> I would like to suggest the removal of libgnutls-openssl from > >>> Fedora,... > > > > That will probably create many legal problems. > > Well only for 2 packages as so far only 2 packages are using ibgnutls-openssl > > > If there's a way to keep this package, we should. > > Agreed another solution would be better one where the gnutls openssl compat > headers uses #defines to change the function names to for example gnutls_ > prefixed symbols. I have reported the problem to the upstream devel mailing list and they would accept the patch into upstream if someone writes it but they are also considering dropping libgnutls-openssl altogether. Unfortunately I won't have time to write the patch till middle of September. So for now I'd suggest to build the affected packages without gnutls-openssl dependency. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
