Chris Adams wrote:
The flip side of that is that libgnutls-openssl is GPLv3+, which means that anything under GPLv2-only or any other non-GPLv3-compatible license may not be able to use it. I'm not sure, since it implements somebody else's interface; can anything using the OpenSSL library API be considered a derived work of libgnutls-openssl (by virtue of linking)?
My understanding is that public API's are not subject to copyright, however IANAL :-).
-- Matthew Person A: It's an ISO standard. Person B: ...And that means what? --mal (http://theangryadmin.blogspot.com/2008/04/future.html) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
