Re: Time to resurrect multi-key signatures in RPM?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:27:43 +0000,
  Bojan Smojver <bojan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I guess from Red Hat's point of view, the only difference would be that Fedora
> packages would not be valid unless signed and uploaded back to updates by
> (required number of) other signatories.

I don't think you are really going to gain much from doing that. And there
is certainly going to be a lot of pain associated with that. It creates
extra work, adds delays, and adds a dependence on third parties. And it
doesn't completely prevent people from getting bad code signed.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux