Re: GNUstep filesystem layout discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday, 24 August 2008 at 15:16, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 02:50:38PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > Axel, what do you think? Seems like keeping the unflattened layout
> > > might be too much trouble; if we are already flattening /usr/bin and
> > > /usr/lib*, might as well stick with a flattened layout after all.
> > 
> > I'm not Axel, but I second this. ;)
> 
> But please understand that we would then have chosen between
> libfoundation and gnustep-base, e.g. only one would be allowed in
> Fedora world. And thus only one subset of application packages would
> survive.
> 
> unflattened != multiarch
> unflattened == choose libcombo at runtime
> flattened == choose libcombo at buildtime

Hm. We don't support mixing lesstif and openmotif either. Is libfoundation
incompatible with gnustep-base?

Anyway, here's an idea:
Put binaries in unflattened %{_libdir}/GNUstep/* and symlink to /usr/bin.

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
Livna http://rpm.livna.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux