Re: Package Review SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
I would like to begin organizing a SIG for package reviews and the
issues surrounding them.  I spent a couple of minutes to create
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Package_Review and put in a couple
of tidbits.  Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
here or, if you wish, privately to me.

Organization is not a particularly strong suit of mine, so I
particularly welcome anyone who is willing to step up and help me get
this thing rolling.


I think thats a great initiative and I would like to thank you and all the other people who are doing reviews on a non trading basis for all your efforts!

Not really related to this SIG, but I while we are on the subject. Around 90 % of reviews / packages are pretty standard, but some can be really tricky. So I want to use this opportunity to offer my help to reviewers for any technical issues which arise during package reviews (for example help the packager solving selinux execstack or textrel issues).


Regards,

Hans

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux