On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 15:16 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > During the feature process review for Fedora 10 it was suggested that > each new feature have a separate tracking bug which would then block the > F10 release blocker. Yes! <snip> > 1) Who will be responsible to make sure that each new bug related to a > new feature blocks its respective tracker? This would be a natural bug > triage activity, but we do not have enough people participating in bug > triage right now to take this on. Obviously the feature owner. > 2) Who is going to walk all the individual feature tracker bugs to make > sure we are ready to release? That's easily scriptable through the bugzilla XMLRPC. > 3) What about features that don't have a BZ component--block the distro > component? That sounds good. > I would like to propose that feature tracking bugs be created on an "as > needed basis" and not for every single feature listed here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/FeatureList For some features, it might not make sense to have bugs, because it's bigger than bugs. Say for "make XX better", it might not make sense to have a tracker bug because a portion of the work would be to see what's needed to make XX better in the first place. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
