Re: Important infrastructure announcement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Danny Yee <danny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Richard Hughes wrote:
>> PackageKit will only allow automatic updates of signed packages. If
>> we're pumping out invalid signed updates then, well, meh.
>
> The implication of the announcement is that signed updates may be
> compromised (or possibly even the key).  How else can we read this?
>
>        "as a precaution, we recommend you not download or update
>        any additional packages on your Fedora systems"
>
> Danny.

It could also be that the build system got a bad compiler installed
(or a compiler got corrupted) and the signed builds have had errors in
them. Not a security breach, but something that would cause problems.
Trying to find out where, which servers were affected, and how that
happened would be just as labor intensive.

Or it could be that NFS has been banging bits before the package gets
signed... or there was a zombie outbreak in PHX and they are chewing
on the wires...

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux