On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 03:54:18PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:02:18PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > Jon Ciesla wrote: > >>> Jon Ciesla wrote: > >>>> Bodhi gives me a 503. Pkgdb and FAS are fine. > >>>> > >>> Yes, we're migrating bodhi from releng1 to releng2 ATM. We're working > >>> out a few kinks in that deployment in #fedora-admin right now. > >> > >> Cool, thanks. > >> > >> Did I miss an Outage notification, or was this intended to be seamless? > >> (No chop-busting is implied, purely curiosity) > >> > > You didn't miss a notification. We had to start migrating to releng2 > > earlier than planned as releng1 was giving us troubles :-( > > Apologies for the lack of a planned outage notification. I was > initially planning on making this a fairly transparent upgrade with very > little downtime -- however, we encountered some issues with the server > that bodhi runs on last night, and I was forced to do the upgrade on the > spot... > > Bodhi is up, and you can view/search/comment on updates, but new update > submissions are currently down. We are working to resolve this as fast > as possible. I'll be sending an announcement with more details once > these issues are resolved. > > Thanks for your patience folks, Bodhi should now be usable again. Please file bugs here: https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/newticket luke
Attachment:
pgpKuzHBB2wls.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
