On Tuesday 12 August 2008 20:13:48 Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > And here I was thinking I was posting to fedora-devel-list. > > Could we discuss technical solutions and ignore Red Hat politics? > What I proposed is a standard method of dealing with these things. We > have modified several packages in the same manner (mainly to make use > of -filesystem packages), and those packages are also in RHEL. It > hasn't been an issue. Ideally syslog-ng would be in EPEL instead of only being available from my repository, and as it is I can't ship it due to this conflict. Last I knew, EPEL was a Fedora initiative. At any rate, I appreciate the suggestions; I just happen to be stuck with a complicated problem. -Doug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
