On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 09:35 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 16:00 +0300, Nikolay Vladimirov wrote: <snip> > > The change just provides some backward compatibility. It's minimal. > > I really think it's not important why the change was made. Since it > > doesn't break anything and it doesn't waste disk space. It may be > > useful for some dead opensource projects that use the older version. > > There are better ways to do this. Providing a compat-curl package is > the proper way. The way it was done now is just a hack with the sole > intention of making flash work again. A compat-curl project that would contain duplicated/unmaintained code? What's the point of this since libcurl didn't break ABI, and only changed soname? This is getting a bit too far. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
