There is no workaround (other than converting+building with ant ofcourse). I have received a request from another packager for maven on ppc64 as well. Rather than waiting until 2.0.9, I think it'll be better to building the existing one on 2.0.4 for now. It is on my agenda for today. Cheers, Deepak * Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> [2008-08-11 14:37]: > I just tried to build a newly approved package, jsr-305, only to have > it fail on PPC64. The failure is because the build uses maven2, which > does not exist on the PPC64 architecture. > > First, there is no FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 bug that I can find that > mentions maven2. Shouldn't there be? > > Second, should I work around this problem? It would be easy to invoke > javac directly for this small package. On the other hand, if I have > to hack up the .spec file to support building with maven when it > exists and support direct javac invocation when it doesn't ... that > .spec file is going to become pretty ugly, and possibly fragile. If I > should not work around the problem, then I should really file a > blocker bug that blocks on [insert # of maven2 blocker bug here], > which doesn't exist, right? > > Thanks for any advice, > -- > Jerry James > http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/ > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
