On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 22:15 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 15:02 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 15:53 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote: > >> > > > >> > > I can see them in rawhide, I just checked a moment ago. > >> > > >> > Yep, they are in rawhide but not in the installation media, at least for > >> > F10 Alpha. > >> > >> Ah, I see, they are subpackages of the openoffice.org source package. > >> Odd. > >> > >> Ideally these packages would be added as conditionals to the appropriate > >> language support groups, and then they'll be pulled in when said groups > >> are requested. > > > > Umm, except they're different executables. What's the actual expected > > behavior if you have both broffice.org-writer and openoffice.org-writer > > installed? > > > > This looks seriously weird to me > > aren't there different desktop files? Yes, but both are going to show up in all locales if you have both installed. And two different apps associated with mime-types, etc. What is the actual functional difference that's trying to be achieved here? Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
