On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 12:45 +0200, Rex Dieter wrote: > Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 10:30 +0200, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > >> How so? > > > > I really am going to try to make a good stab at maintaining the > packages > > I'm proposing for Fedora, but as I won't list my 'Vacations' in > public, > > I don't mean to pester, but I'm curious. You have an averstion to > documenting when you won't be available online, why? Because some people value privacy and his own business ? Besides 2 weeks may seem ok for an US PoV, cause we do not get vacations here but in Europe and other parts of the world, people get normally 4/5 weeks of vacation time and it is not rare for people to go on vacation in places where there is no internet access (and I do not blame them if they don't want to connect even if available during their vacation). A 2 weeks awol policy seem overly restrictive, although having co-maintainers is certainly a smart idea for anybody. Simo. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
