On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 23:12 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:06:09AM -0230, David Carter wrote: > > Hey folks! > > > > I'm a newbie to package submission, and I've encountered some selinux > > issues when packaging my Apache module. The module runs fine without > > selinux, but won't run without some new rules and file configurations. > > > > How is this normally handled in packages? Am I expected to add > > configurations to handle this? How do I handle cases where selinux isn't > > enabled? > > I know some provide a -selinux sub-package to deal with doing selinux > policy changes. I'm not sure if this is the official, preferred way or > not however. And there's no real automated way for someone installing > your package (who has selinux enabled on their machine) to even be > aware that the -selinux package exists. I ran into this with awstats. > So you might make mention of it in the README.Fedora for the main > package at the very least. I know the SELinux folks are keen to have packages that provide services also provide an accompanying policy module. You might want to consider asking this question on the fedora-selinux-list, where I'll bet you'll be able to get some help and pointers: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
