On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:16:28 -0700, J. Randall Owens wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > | Summary of broken packages (by owner): > | > | ebmunson AT us.ibm.com > | lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.i386 > | lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc > | lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc64 > | lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.x86_64 > | > > These are caused by a bug I reported about a month and a half ago, libvpd's > library numbers got bumped down in the 2.0.2 release. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452851 > > There's been no action on it since then; The corresponding update in bodhi was this: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-4187 Effectively, this soname problem has been reported in two places. > I'm not sure whether it should be > against lsvpd, which would just need a rebuild with the new library number, or > to get libvpd's library number back where it was (assuming it's binary compatible). > libvpd 2.0.0 had major version 0, libvpd 2.0.1 bumped to major version 1, then they reverted that in 2.0.2. Meanwhile 2.0.3 is available and stays at major version 0. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
