Re: static uids/gids and (not) using fedora-usermgmt (was: uids for daemons on a spin)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/8/7 Jeffrey Ollie <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Unless you're using something like NFS which uses UIDs as part of it's
> protocol I don't see why you'd care about what UIDs a user is mapped to.
> Seems to me like consistency for consistency's sake... (I suppose there are
> some braindead programs that embed a particular UID at compile time, but
> since this is open source it's pretty easy to work around such lameness).

A team of ~10 sysadmins handling tens of thousands of servers in
adverse conditions - with the help of field technicians. Every bit of
added consistency, even if seemingly pointless, wins.

We might use NFS - unlikely, the _user_ accounts still have different
uids - but there will be other cases where we might need stable uids,
like shipping formatted disks around (with Real file systems, not
vfat).

Except for user data, I want to have everything in place to ensure
that we *know* where every bit must be :-)

cheers,


m
-- 
 martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx
 martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux