On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 18:10 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > That why I didn't suggest to use the build date and mentioned to use "48 > or 72 hours after the problems was hit for the first time". That of > cause would need to be managed on the client (e.g. for each broken dep > write down somewhere when the problem showed up; if the same problem > shows up with the same packages 72 hours later then boil out to make > sure the user gets aware of the issue). And what about when said build has spent a number of days in -testing, and finally goes out to -final, then the build date is quite old, but would be 'hit for the first time' by a larger number of people. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
