Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2008-08-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating writes:

On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 18:23 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Normally, messages from <buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> that I get are various build-related stuff just for my package, and I filter them in their own bucket. These new EVR validator messages also carry the same return address, but are not regarding my package. Does it make sense to use the same From: address for stuff that's not necessarily related to your packages?

Hrm, I'm using the same address to send individual messages to people as
well as the report message to the list.  There are a couple addresses we
have to use, one is rawhide@ and the other is buildsys@.  Sending from
rawhide@ didn't make much since to me since this covers more than just
rawhide.

Do you set the To: header for individual messages? If so, I'll just filter based on the To: header.


Attachment: pgpQLa6KyWhYP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux