Caolan McNamara wrote: > Given that we've got openjdk on most platforms. Would it make sense to > package our java things so that the gcj ahead-of-time compiled stuff is > packaged into separate subrpms. e.g. taking hsqldb as a random example > the package takes 3696k but the aot /usr/lib/gcj/hsqldb contents takes > 2928k of that and it's unused except for the java-is-gij case right ? > > We typically end up with openjdk installed due to the web plugin and > then with java-1.5.0-gcj + dependencies installed due to > the /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db and .so requires of the java packaging > guidelines when installing any additional java package. > > I'd like to e.g. have the option of just having openjdk installed and > not have to haul around the 45Megs in my /usr/lib/gcj dir Sure, but it's potentially a lot of work to make the change, and how would the people who are running gcj know that they need to download the gcj ahead-of-time compiled stuff to get decent performance? Andrew. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
