On Jul 28, 2008, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It surely was on-topic here to talk about whether unfree binary blobs > should be included in Fedora. +1 I wonder why nobody's complaining about all this traffic on this non-technical thread on a list that people complained was supposed to be restricted to technical content. Heck, why was the discussion even started here? Double standards, as usual? > Do we really want to say that if any ethical question arises during > discussion on Fedora lists, people may not address it? Seems like that's the general feeling of those who demand silence about it. Perhaps a separate list named "fedora-truth" or "fedora-ethics", for this kind of discussion, would make it clear enough that truth and ethics are not welcome on other lists. Or maybe the support list should be named fedora-immoralist ;-P :-D -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} FSFLA Board Member ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
