> (Is it really a good idea to be using a back-rev rpm for one part of > the build process, and the latest and greatest for other parts? It > certainly calls future build reproducibility into question, if you ask > me.) A problem like this came up before when kernel.spec started using fancy macros. (I think this was in koji's previous life as the RH-internal brew.) I thought they told me they fixed it. But now it occurs to me that while I talked about this very issue and took "fixed it" to mean using the rpmbuild from the buildroot for all steps of srpm-making, they might have just upgraded the servers to RHEL5 from RHEL4 and that was a new enough rpm version to fix the particular case that had come up, and that's what "they fixed it" really meant. Thanks, Roland -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
