> The real question becomes, is who is an idiot? > > There are certainly people who are trouble, but how long until a > policy such as this just turns into a witch hunt? > > You don't like someone? Great, just bait them into breaking the > policy and get them kicked out! > > If you don't like a thread, just ignore it. That's a lot less work > than creating an overly elaborate code of conduct nobody is really > going to follow anyway. Agreed. The noise can be annoying, but it's pretty subjective from person to person as to what is and what isn't. I think this is why a "topical" approach would be more appropriate vs trying set up some code of ethics. It's a lot easier to argue in favor of a new list because a certain topic or group of topics continue to come up (otherwise we'd just have one big list for everything and "filter" as needed). So, fedora-advocacy or fedora-argue makes a lot of sense framed like that IMO; less so on a "we need to regulate this" basis. > I compare this to talking to a boring person at a party. Are you going to > stand there and complain how boring they are, or go find someone more > interesting to talk to? Ray -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
