Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2008-07-26

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes:
> Nope, because once a package only has things in updates, there is
> nothing tagged with updates-testing, so the checker if it didn't check
> against dist-f9-updates it would miss that comparison.

OK, so it needs like the tester needs to be smarter and realize that if there's 
a newer build in updates-testing it's OK. I guess dist-fn-updates-testing needs 
to be compared with the most recent of dist-f(n+1)-updates and 
dist-f(n+1)-updates-testing, but dist-fn-updates only with dist-f(n+1)-updates 
(because I don't think we want updates being pushed for the older release when 
they're still in testing in the newer one).

I can take a look at the code of the script to see if I can fix it.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux