On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tom Lane <tgl <at> redhat.com> writes: > > So, sure enough, I got blindsided by the fact that rawhide's RPM now > > applies patches with --fuzz=0. I don't object to tightening the > > policy like that, but it's pretty unhappy-making that having tested > > an SRPM on my Fedora 9 system offers no protection against the koji > > build failing. > > For the KDE packages, we're simply adding %define _default_patch_fuzz > 2 to our specfiles whenever a patch doesn't apply due to fuzz. eww... why not rebase the patch instead? (while making sure it's still a valid result) -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
