On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:45:39 -0500 Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 25 July 2008, Warren Togami wrote: > > > sinjdoc > With the removal of sinjdoc gcj now requires openjdk for javadoc. due to a > bug its been that way at buildtime for awhile now. but sinjdoc was a Requires > and worked for runtime javadoc needs. but now the only javadoc parser is in > openjdk. IMO this is bad. Why is that bad? josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
