Re: [RFC] Package Updates/Bodhi Notification Content Policy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 18:51 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
Noting a new version or snapshot is a good thing, sure; but users should
> not need to go hunting through down upstream changelogs or bug trackers
> or to figure out why the package update is being issued. 

Wow, that wording was horrible.

Should read: "Noting a new version or snapshot is a good thing, sure;
but users should not need to go hunting through upstream changelogs or
bug trackers to figure out why the package update is being issued."

Sorry for the confusion..
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux