On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 14:40 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 14:52 +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > Tim Jackson wrote: > > > Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > >> We have several options for the Fedora 10 codename, and you get to help > > >> decide which we use! > > > > > > Please may we have an additional option "None"? > > > > Is "Neon" not close enough? > > "Neon" apparently didn't make it through legal, despite being popular on > the list. I'd like to know why. *koff koff* http://www.google.com/search?q=neon+software > I have to say, I find the list of names this time around to be rather... > uninteresting. Uninspiring. > > Is legal sucking the life out of the process? I think we can do better at the raw naming, frankly. Mea maxima culpa for "Neon" because I put forth that particular name. For the future, something to think about: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Naming_Guidelines -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
