On Wednesday, 23 July 2008 at 10:16, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Hans de Goede wrote: > >Doug Ledford wrote: > >>I've been working on getting this set up and functional. > > > ><lots of complicated hacks and workarounds deleted> [...] > >It seems there are a few people who are a big fan of this, and about as > >much active opponents. I have no problems with adding the possibility to > >use a distributed VCS with exploded trees to the mix of ways to maintain > >and build packages, but this should not replace the current nice and > >simple setup we have. > > > > Noone has proposed replacing the existing setup, so the rest of your > email can safely be delegated to /dev/null. Let me provide the missing quote then: > >>First, we have to do away with a bunch of our make targets because they > >>are too commonly named and might conflict with legitimate upstream make > >>targets (well, more like some of them might conflict, some of them > >>*definitely* conflict). This is important because our Makefile.common > >>is included in upstream's toplevel Makefile. If that doesn't touch our existing setup then fine, but I'm afraid Doug really meant what he wrote. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann Livna http://rpm.livna.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
