Re: Firmware packages with a mislabelled license?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> Sourceforge labels it as:
>>
>> License : BSD License, GNU General Public License (GPL),
>> Other/Proprietary License
>
> And that's essentially correct. As I said in the other thread, the correct
> license tag for Fedora is:
> License: (MIT or GPLv2+) and Redistributable, no modification permitted
>
> The firmware loader is dual MIT/GPLv2+, the actual firmware is only
> redistributable. The package contains both.

http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/devel/midisport-firmware/midisport-firmware.spec?view=markup

Then this is a clear bug.  I'll fire up bugzilla.

-Yaakov Nemoy

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux