Re: ENVR checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 13:49 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> Ummm, seems to me what really needs to happen is something, somewhere in
> the build/push system needs to refuse to ever allow broken upgrade
> chains to get pushed into the repos in the first place. Or at least warn
> you the very second you request such an action. Rather than trying to
> detect and clean up the mess after the fact.

I don't disagree, to an extent.  However without that, which is a much
longer term project, we should still have info about what breakage has
already been done, rather than waiting on bug reports to come in.  So we
can get to the reactionary world today, while working on the proactive
world for the future.

Of course putting all these checks into the updates push isn't going to
help getting updates out any faster.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux