David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 16:10 +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote:
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Something like
| --enable-targets=%_host
should be added everytime to allow e.g. 'strip' to work on both native
and on target binaries. This is required when building cross-rpms which
are providing target and native binaries.
Is it really? You already have to use the appropriate compiler and
linker for native vs. target binaries -- why can't you use the
appropriate version of 'strip', too?
rpm magic; final %__spec_install_post makes something like
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive arm-iwmmxt-linux-gnueabi-strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note arm-iwmmxt-linux-gnueabi-strip arm-iwmmxt-linux-gnueabi-objdump
+
and does not differ between target and native binaries.
Hm, OK. I suppose it doesn't hurt much. Updated patch then...
<...snip...>
Has this work/discussion progressed at all? I'm interested in cross
tools (x86->ppc) and would
like to get involved in making these happen.
Any pointers on how I can get started (where/how to pick up the current
work, etc)?
Thanks
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
