Re: handling a 'debug' or 'development' setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 06:02:50PM -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
 > On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 18:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
 > > 1) What can we reasonably set?
 > >    
 > >    Right now, there's MALLOC_CHECK_ and MALLOC_PERTURB. There
 > >    should be more. Is there anything in the various desktops
 > >    that is appropriate?
 > 
 > I would love it if, when this 'debug mode' is active, any package
 > installation would automagically install the relevant debuginfos to
 > accompany it. (Likewise, any package removal should remove the leaf
 > debuginfo.)

If that happens it should definitly be optional given the size of
debuginfo packages.  I can't think of a single situation where I'd
need the debuginfo for every package installed.  Installing them
on demand before running gdb is painful, but a lot less so than
sitting around twiddling thumbs waiting for yum to update several
gig of debuginfos.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux