On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah, there is actually a benefit to tarball+patches approach we take > right now; and that benefit is that it's extremely easy to see just what > we've done to the upstream package, and it's usually really easy to > extract those changes and push them upstream. You don't want a > mega-diff that includes 20 specific patches. I know of at least one example currently in our cvs where we went from a set of separate small patch files to one encompassing patch file. I think it was a diff from git. If we move to more advanced vcs are we going to have a harder time keeping patches separated? Or is it just a matter of education on how not to reach for the easy to produce mega patch shortcut? -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
