Re: Study: Attacks on package managers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

obviously that means metadata needs good signatures as packages do,
right? That should be easy to implement. Also metadata should be
versioned and that version should be updated on a regulary (e.g. daily)
base. (I don't know if it already is) Than one could simply diff the
metadata(-hash) of two or more servers with a trusted base server to
figure out if someone holds back updates.

So that should not be _that_ big problem at all, right?

Christoph 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux