Patrice Dumas (pertusus@xxxxxxx) said: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:48:35AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 17:42 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > That's not what my experience is. Bug with fix not acted upon is almost > > > always by people @ redhat. But I really don't want to start a flamewar > > > about who are the good and the bad guys I want a policy for bug with > > > fixes. > > > > Whilst I do like that you're trying to solve this problem, I think one > > big hole here is who decides that the "fix" is either easy, or right? > > There is nothing about the fix being right. The criterion is having a > fix. These 3 situation may qualify for a bug easy to fix: Wait, you want to escalate sanctions (or whatever you'd like to call them) without any knowledge of whether or not the fix is *right*? Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
