On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:29:40AM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote: >>> >> bugzilla get to the 'frontpage.cgi' (which imo is damn useful) and go >> "what the, when was THAT bug reported" and notice that it was slipped in >> the middle of a batch of gnome bugs. >> >> So please give maintainers a break from fearing of missing an 'easy >> bug', we make mistakes (honest), we miss things, we forget to tell >> people that the reason why the bug isn't fixed is because we are working >> on getting brand new version y packaged that'd fix it better than a one >> line patch, heck, we are humans! > > The policy tries to respect that, while still being effective. I have > put 3 weeks before the procedure is started, a first comment, a > remainder after 2 weeks and then 2 weeks before the procedure of > orphaning which will still leave time for the packager to react and will > put the issue in the public arena. This can certainly be improved, just > propose. The delay can be expanded, for example, the issue is more, in > my opinion to have those bugs tracked than to have those fixed in a > given time. Can we just add them to a tracker "easy bugs" and maintainers can just go there and fix this bugs as long as the ACLs are open? If a maintainer does NOT want this he shouldn't have enabled open ACLs at all. "Everybody can access my packages, but don't dare to touch them" is just plain stupid. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
