>>>>> "NJ" == Nigel Jones writes: NJ> Just an FYI before the Rawhide Report arrives, Yes gtk-sharp2 was NJ> bumped to 2.12.1 (at my request), yes it has broken the NJ> dependencies BUT: NJ> The reason this time is that rpm forgot to calculate the mono NJ> dependencies (something that can be expected with any major bump), NJ> with the old version of RPM the same Provides for 2.12.0-2 and NJ> 2.12.1-1 were calculated, so there isn't a need for a mass NJ> rebuild, just one of gtk-sharp2. Bummer. I wonder if there was collateral damage to the provides/requires capabilities for other languages as well? NJ> So I think it's just a case of been patient while the mono NJ> provides bug is sorted and then be on our way. Can you post the bug number for this mono provides/requires breakage if there is one? (Presumably it should be filed against the rpm component and/or reported upstream if necessary). Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
