On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A number of builds have gone through successfully, including ppc64 variants. Things are looking good so far.... It'll be interesting to see what happens with the composed rawhide tree tomorrow.
--
Jes
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
Ok, take two, build just completed. The ppc64 issue should be gone, at least things work on in mock. Hopefully it lasts in the builders a bit longer than previous try ;) but if it causes troubles, just untag it and let me know...On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 15:27 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Mamoru Tasaka (mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
After koji began to accept jobs again, all dist-f10 ppc64 builds seem
to be failing due to some strange error?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=710447
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=710455
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=710471
None of them have build.log and root.log say:
DEBUG util.py:272: Executing command: ['rpm', '-Uvh', '--nodeps', '/builddir/build/originals/xscreensaver-5.05.90.3-3.fc10.src.rpm']
DEBUG util.py:250: memory alloc (41 bytes) returned NULL.
Would someone investigate what is happening here?
Almost certianly the new rpm broke.
Bill
Yeah, that's coming from rpm in the chroot. I can easily reproduce.
I'm going to untag the new rpm until we sort this out. It'll be a bit
before builds start working again.
A number of builds have gone through successfully, including ppc64 variants. Things are looking good so far.... It'll be interesting to see what happens with the composed rawhide tree tomorrow.
--
Jes
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
