On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 09:12:50AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 02:04 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > There are several occasions where the individual maintainers are still > > active and working on some software packages while not fixing trivial > > bugs on other software packages. > > Surely the maintainer in question knows the package well enough to > decide whether to merge patches? For instance, I might push a patch > upstream and hold off applying it to fedora as it's trivial and will get > updated at the next version bump of my package in a few weeks. But you can mention it on the patch, so that the reporter knows what is happening. Or close UPSTREAM. Also I have added a 3 weeks delay before this is started. This leads to 3 weeks + 1 month time. > This all seems so very beurocratic to me. It is. But burocracy is required when it comes to forcing other contributors. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
