On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 19:07 -0300, jeff wrote: > I don't know what the ramifications are, but it definitely has different > behaviour if you disable using selinux=0 than if you don't. I see no reason why > it should be loaded, initialized, etc. if it isn't wanted. Because relying on boot options is a great way to cause problems for yourself later on down the line. If you boot with selinux=0, the installer disables SELinux for the installed system. The fact that we use a better and more persistent means of disabling it and also one that can be reversed if you later decide that you want SELinux is a *positive* thing. Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
