On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:15:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I've got a self-building, mostly working set of Fedora packages for > the MinGW cross-compiler (no optional libraries yet). You can get the > spec files and instructions by doing: > > hg clone http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel What primarily concerns me is that plan around keeping this in sync with patches/updates to the main gcc, binutils, libpng, libgcrypt, gnutls, etc RPMS already in Fedora. The idea of maintaining 2 near identical specs & builds for all these packages isn't that nice, particularly since many of these are security sensitive packages Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
