On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The three initial contributors, myself, Dan Berrange and Daniel > Veillard, are primarily interested in providing a libvirt client > library and some libvirt-based tools for Windows users (so that they > will be able to manage Linux systems running libvirtd remotely). > However we think that a cross-compiler could have much wider interest > in the Fedora community. Which of our contributors had developed the liveusb creator tool for windows? I'm sure they'd be interested in making use of this toolchain, maybe helping with it. I think Lmacken is one of them. I was also talking to someone on irc about bringing a wubi-alike application to install and run Fedora as a windows application. I forget exactly who I was talking to..sorry... but the conversation did touch on needing the minGW cross-compiler to build the application. Once we have a viable cross compiler toolchain available as part of our project, have we thought about how we can expose it so we can build and host 'official' project tools meant to be used on windows? As the liveusb-creator experience has shown, there is a place for window executables in the project's binary offerings. As long as we can build them in an open build system, we shouldn't have any fundamental policy problems generating more tool of that nature.. but have we thought about how we would want to setup the build system and distribution of such executables? -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
