On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:43 PM, jeff <moe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > drago01 wrote: >> >> The whole discussion is pointless ... the option is not gone you *can* >> disable it after install if you want. > > You *could* disable it at install time too, easily. It would likely install > faster as well. You could set stuff like display resolution at install time too .. and we got rid of it, which is a good thing imho. Why should it be faster? >> Let me repeat this again you *can* still disable it if you want, >> nobody is forcing you to use it. > > Yes, I know that. Fine, where is the problem than? >> Asking everything at install time is just wrong and confusing for average >> users. > > I agree. That's why my proposal doesn't ask anything at install time, thus > the average user doesn't have to confront the issue. As a parallel example, > I offer how xfs/jfs/reiserfs are available, but the user isn't prompted. > > In my solution the average user wouldn't be confused at all because they > wouldn't see it--just like they don't see xfs/jfs/reiserfs options. Which shouldn't be the case but that's a different topic. >> Add adding some hidden anaconda option only to save 1-2min for people >> that want to disable something doesn't make sense to me. > > Well, it would actually save more than 1-2 min. Well changing one line in /etc/selinux/config can't take much longer ;) > And it really isn't a hidden > anaconda option, it's just having anaconda pass that to grub. Anaconda > already has some support for this, it just doesn't pass it to grub. It may > be a simple one-liner in anaconda. Well the options get passed to the kernel not to anaconda, it just parses (abuses) the kernel cmdline for stuff like this. (which isn't a bad thing in general) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
