On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 19:52 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 18:08 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > Please test these packages, and report any bugs on email (reply to this > > thread please), rather than the admin update page. When we've got quite > > a bit of testing and ironed out and regressions then I'll push to > > stable. > > > > I've been using rawhide snapshots for a while and when I noticed these > upgrades in koji, I "downgraded" to the F9 version. So far seems stable, > no real issues noticed, only some not-so-intuitive behaviour during > installing local rpms: > > * It always asks for authentication and there is no option to remember > the authentication when it discovers thath the package is not signed. Is > it intentional? > > * The window with update progress closes itself after I give the needed > permissions to install and as a result I am not notified of the update > result. I can reopen the window via the notify icon though... > > Hm... come to think of it, I just remembered it does not say the > installation failed if some pre/post-install scriplet failed. I noticed > it while upgrading broken intel driver package multiple times, until > finally discovering in command line (yum update), that actually some > scriplet was giving and error. Btw. the said package was fixed rather > promptly. Yum seems to be OK with failing scriplets (i.e. finishes the > update/install/remove of other packages and marks the installation as > success), so this might not be PackageKit fault. > s/yum/rpm/ some failing scriptlets are not fatal to the transaction. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
