Le samedi 05 juillet 2008 à 14:33 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit : > On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 08:46 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 11:16 +0100, Caolan McNamara wrote: > > > I'm packaging jfreereport and one of the dependencies is a java package > > > called "libxml", > > > i.e. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=51669 > > > "LibXML is a namespace aware SAX-Parser" and is no relation to the c > > > libxml/libxml2. What's an acceptable name for the package given that > > > "libxml" is taken, libxml-java ? libxml-jfreereport ? > > > > That's unfortunate that they decided to stomp on someone else's name. > > It's unfortunate that Java folks feel they have to reimplement the > world, regardless of the nomenclature they use. You mean, unlike the perl or lisp guys? There is a lot of bad things to be said about Java but this particular failure is not Java-specific. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
